pavelmachek (pavelmachek) wrote,

fastest clock

Gaining ten minutes in two hours tipped me off a bit -- that's too bad even for $3 clock.

It turned out that the clock can really keep time -- given "good enough" power supply. They were really designed with their small batteries in mind. Give them 2.4V (2x NiMH), and they gain time at 10minutes per two hours (and other glitches, like sometimes going into "time not advancing" mode, when seconds change but get reset to 0 when you stop watching them). Give them 3V (2x primary cell), and they fail to work, producing distorted, blinking display. Give them 1x primary cell, 1x NiMH, and they fail to work, too. But give them 1x new primary cell, and 1x almost empty primary cell, for 2.7V total, and voila, they actually start keeping time...

  • Certified danger

    I suspected Linux Foundation went to the dark side when they started strange deals with Microsoft. But I'm pretty sure they went to dark side…

  • Pretty big side-effect

    Timing and side-channels are not normally considered side-effects, meaning compilers and cpus feel free to do whatever they want. And they do.…

  • Complex cameras coming to PCs

    It seems PCs are getting complex cameras. Which is bad news for PCs, because existing libv4l2 will not work there, but good news for OMAP3, as there…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.